There
is a specific group of American citizens, Conservatives, who have fundamental differences
with this government. The differences are profound and intense; striking at the
core of each of the party’s most deeply held beliefs. It could be said that
they are irreconcilable.
Granted
there have been high levels of tension between portions of the citizenry and
the government before. Most notable are those related to civil rights,
particularly institutionalized racial prejudice. The discordance resulted in
uniquely American uprisings such that they were found ultimately to correct the
government, realigning it with the principles of our Foundation enumerated in the
Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure
these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles
and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
effect their Safety and Happiness.
It
is therefore fitting that the people who formed the government to secure these
rights would be those who also have the right to admonish that very same
government for failing to secure them. The Civil Rights Movement was an
exercise of this very principle.
While
“civil rights” is a phrase that has since been narrowed by characteristics of
this predominant example in history, that of a racial minority being
discriminated against, the principles upon which the Movement was based must
not thereby be lost to the application of other oppressions.
It
is indeed an irony that “civil rights” have also been narrowly understood to
have been championed by the liberal and thwarted by conservatives. This not
only in the sense that historically leftist regimes have little to show of any
form of civility and have used “helping the downtrodden” only as an excuse for
their tyrannical designs, but also that conservatism itself might now become
the new oppressed group.
It
is further an irony that liberals who claim to hold the banner of civil rights would
even now oppress and actively seek the ruin of a group of citizens based upon
their creed: conservatism.
Furthermore,
they play the same tactics over and over again regardless of the contorted
hypocrisy to the underlying “principles” which they claim to possess. Now that
they take claim of the government and stand against their ideological opponent
citizens, they seek to become the victims of “belligerent insurgents” who might
stand in their way, dispensing with civil rights issues. It is as if the
oppressed are now supposed to become the oppressors of the government by their
dissent.
The
only way for this to effectually transpire is for this government to apply
enough pressure on conservatives to react in a manner which they can
characterize as “terrorism” against the United States. Secondarily, if the
conservatives fail to attempt such an overt “realignment” of government (and
although it is their right under the Constitution), then the government must manufacture
“threats.”
Since
the “war on terror” is one which is elusive and amorphous, it does not have a
definable ending. This allows it to be the perfect pretext for a “solution”
that also will continue indefinitely. Thus conservatives or someone (Occupy
Wall Street?) must fill the role of the threat, in order to legitimize a
permanent and “fundamental” change.
But
why do they need to be legitimate? Why not just get it done, take over and
start their post America regime? The government needs an excuse to clamp down on the people, for without it, the transition
to the new form of government will be more difficult. After all, there are
millions of Americans who value their freedoms.
After
the transition, all of the oppressive mechanisms will be in place and the issue
of legitimacy will have taken its last breath. The new government will not have
to worry about the opinions of its “subjects” anymore.
It
is like giving someone a “sucker punch.” You would like your opponent to be as
clueless as possible before you hit him. Once he has been hit, the rest of the
dominance becomes academic.
If
the people were to rise up in the proper manner, the government could lose
control of the process and face the possibility of failure before achieving the
dominance.
For
example, if a segment of the public were aware of the conspiracy and in possession
of facts supporting that it is under construction, they could short circuit the
treason by rallying enough of the general public to put it to a stop before the
“sucker punch” occurs.
To
offset this possibility, the rogue government takes over the media, demonizes
the group which is contrary to its designs and then positions itself to the
general public as the victim of an illegitimate insurgency. If this dialogue is
allowed to prevail, the dissenting group is neutralized: if they rise up to put
a stop to the development of the oppressive infrastructure, they play the role
of belligerents and thereby invite the oppression of which they sought to
allay; if they do not rise up, the development of the oppressiveness increases
until there is the desired uprising or the final state of oppression is reached
by default, the general public having been led like sheep to the slaughter. Either
way, the general public will have sustained the “sucker punch” and will then be
subject to the full weight of oppression before having the ability to fight
back.
The
“general public” is here defined as those who are either not aware of the
threats to our liberty, or are aware but believe they will come out ahead of
their opponent after class warfare or elections.
Since
the liberals and their media have worked on labeling Conservatives bigots for
years, the dissenters of treason must proactively thwart this inevitable spin
or there will be substantial forces who might believe that selective oppression
of Conservatives should be allowed as “payback” for prior oppressions they
account to Conservatives. The fight against treason and widespread oppression
will be fractured by making it a fight between haves and have-nots, between the
religious and secular cultures. Therefore, the positions articulated in the
dissenting events must not be piecemeal or divisive but formulate the
commonality of interests among all freedom-loving Americans.
As
for those who rely solely on elections or common political processes, they
simply do not understand the scope and resolve of this regime’s ideological
ambitions or the ideology’s history.
In
order for the rogue government to lose the force of its oppression, the general
public must understand the truth: the government is the oppressor, or intended
oppressor, of the civil rights of the rallying group, the Conservatives,
because they seek expansive
oppression. The rallying of citizens must not only be accomplished by getting
this information out without appearing belligerent to “America” (as impudently
defined by those in power) but must garner the truthful understanding that it
is classical, albeit fundamental, American dissent. Once they understand that
the oppression based on the creed of a particular group of people is being set
up to establish expansive oppression, more will rally behind them.
Discrimination is easily understood to be immoral and the value of freedom
would be soberly weighed against its loss without valid pretext by a wide range
of the public.
A note from CLDC: Our web site is
packed full of documents and videos directly from the Government outlining
their intentions and the actions they have already taken to strip us of our “unalienable
Rights”, we believe it is our duty and yours to educate ourselves on these
issues and stand against the onslaught of Tyranny
No comments:
Post a Comment